Sattelite Sites SEO

Posted by Michael Martinez on July 17, 2007 in Intermediate SEO


SEO For Sattelite Sites


A lot of people have been clicking through to SEO Theory for the expression “satellite sites SEO” and some variations on that. I have never really discussed this particular aspect of search engine optimization and I am surprised people want to know more. It’s not really even discussed on the usual SEO blogs and forums. So who are the people who want to know more about satellite sites SEO?

You could, I suppose, be interested in optimizing Web sites about satellites. There is actually a large market for information on satellites given that we have satellite TV, satellite Internet access, satellite radio, and GPS satellite networks. Even cell phones work with satellites so the average person (in America or western Europe, at least, not to mention Japan and several other Asian countries) is very likely to make direct use of a satellite at least once per day.

However, I get the impression that my SEO satellite sites readers are looking for information on how to set up and optimize small networks of Web sites. The satellite sites work for the primary brand but they need to create their own brand strength. So let’s talk about satellite sites SEO and see what kind of trouble that will cause.


Who should use satellite sites SEO?


The average online business model does not easily support a satellite sites network. Which is not to say that you can’t just go create a group of Web sites and call them satellites. But a “satellite site” is somehow closely associated with the main brand while advocating its own brand. A poor business model for using satellite sites might be a company that manufactures garden hoses for retail outlets. If you’re not selling directly to consumers you really only need one Web site.

But if your garden hose manufacturing operation serves multiple channels there might be justifiable reason for creating several Web sites. Let’s assume you have a contractors’ channel, a wholesale distributors’ channel, and a retail channel. It often makes good business sense to distinguish between your channels so that customers find the right content. You want to minimize confusion.

But how do you justify the burdern of operating three separate Web channels? You have to look at the queries people use to find your products. If the retailers and distributors you sell to don’t actually use queries to find you, but rather have to be told about your Web sites through your sales force, you can dispense with search engine optimization and make your business-to-business sites more functional. Don’t invest a lot of time in on-site marketing if the marketing is driven by off-site processes.

If you have a consumer marketing program that differs from your vendor and outlet marketing then most likely your consumer channel will have a distinct query profile. You should set up a separate site that serves that distinct query profile. Your Web design should address that market, and you can free your Web developer from unnecessary burdens by breaking the consumer channel out from vendor and contractor channels.

But when you create multiple channels you run the risk of blurring the primary brand value for your corporate name. In a situation where a company builds multiple channels for products and services on separate Web sites I would take the additional step of moving the corporate brand to its own informational site. The corporate brand will be the heart of the channel network.


Build Distinct Channels


Whether you’re dividing your market into wholesale/retail sectors or geographical sectors, your channel brands need to stand on their own. You don’t want to create a network just for the sake of building a network of Web sites. Maintaining and updating a network requires more work than maintaining and updating a single Web site. You want to avoid cookie-cutter Web design, which only causes user confusion. The minimal value you’ll obtain from linking between domains doesn’t justify the cost of creating a network.

And that is, I think, what people are hoping for: a boost in link value from within their own network. You don’t have to reciprocate links, buy links, or otherwise “build” links if you have your own network of trusted sites that the search engines constantly crawl and index. There is some truth in that idea, but 10 worthless sites that no one else will link to is still 10 worthless sites that no one else will link to.

You have to create value for the online visitor, not for the search engines. If you really do build out multiple channels then cross-marketing your brands won’t always make sense. In some cases it does. For example, let’s say your company operates an airline reservation site, a hotel reservation site, a rental car site, and other travel-related sites. It makes perfect sense for your channels to cross-promote each other because their content complements each other’s content.

Cross-promotion only works when it doesn’t cause confusion. Even if you only operate affiliate link farm sites (which the search engines don’t really want to promote in their results) your cross-promotion should make sense to the people you’re hoping will click on your affiliate links. You should always be thinking in terms of creating content that people want to return to. There is virtually enough competition in every established industry that people have a choice of networks to choose from.

Make your network the most fun, the most valuable, the easiest to use, the most helpful. Give people a reason to link to your sites instead of someone else’s. Give people a reason to keep coming back to your network. Part of the process of building that kind of customer loyalty is ensuring that your cross-promotion doesn’t become the objective of the network.


Successful Satellite Sites SEO


To succeed with satellite sites SEO you have to focus on the brands that you’re promoting and the markets they serve. You cannot allow yourself to be caught up in a link building frenzy that devalues your content and makes your network look like a spammy collection of worthless Web sites. If every home page in your network is splattered with the same cross-promotional advertising you’re doing it wrong. If every home page in your network uses the same navigational link structures you’re doing it wrong.

Each site in your network has to have its own “About Us” page that offers a unique, distinctive profile of the product or service division that the site represents. You should also include a distinctive link back to the corporate profile site so that people can learn more about your company. The corporate site should serve as the primary hub for your network. It can and should offer unique information about each subsidiary site in the network.

Each site in your network should have its own unique “Contact us” page. You don’t want to be deceptive and pretend there are different sales offices and distribution points. Rather, you want to make sure that each contact page offers the exact information that people need to contact you about that particular channel. Channel-oriented communication has to exist, and must be supported, in order for this to work well.

On my personal network I do use a consolidated communication function and I can assure you it causes confusion. I have not taken the time to distinguish the contact features but I should. So my forum administrators sometimes see communications from people looking for advertising, wanting to set up partnerships, and private communications to me or my partner from people who want to ask us specific questions. In a business network, you really cannot afford that kind of sloppy organization. Make sure each satellite site has its own contact information.

You want to avoid replicating information across your network, but some companies do reuse legal notices, terms of service, trademark declarations, disclaimers, etc. That kind of content distribution is usually okay. Don’t agonize over it. You want to focus on building value for each satellite market.

With respect to search engine optimization your satellite network should be targeting different query expressions. While it might seem valuable to control the front page of Google’s results for a few keywords, a well-designed satellite network creates opportunities for you to explore in long-tail optimization you usually don’t see even with large content mega sites. Mega site optimization tends to focus on a few key topics. Satellite site optimization should focus on a few key topics per Web site.

And that means you have to devote more time to keyword research, more time to building content, more time to analyzing referral data. Your satellite network can capture distinct landing page data, track unique customer profiles, and otherwise break down data that a mega site would have to consolidate. But you don’t want to sacrifice the value of consolidating data in order to serve multiple brands. You should use consistent metrics across your network so that you can easily combine the numbers where you need to do so.

If you want to create a network-wide customer profile (which makes sense in some industries, such as the travel industry model I used as an example above) then a unified login and cookie structure is perfectly fine. Tracking customer sessions and transactions across brands should be seamless and inobtrusive to your visitors. They’ll also appreciate seeing less advertising if you allocate popup advertisements across your network (a practice I oppose, but you need to make your own business decisions).

Avoid the temptation to use a single content management system for your network. While it doesn’t matter if you host all your sites on the same IP address, sharing the same database does offer some risk. For example, if one site goes down they’ll all go down. In fact, using a single server for your entire network is also risky (but I do this for my personal network). You need to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of consolidation versus distributed hosting. There is no universal justification for either style of Web content hosting.

In the end, your goal for practicing satellite sites SEO should not be to promote a single Web site through link boosting sites. Rather, it should be to expand your search visibility and profile in ways where mega site efficiencies don’t make sense. You can get one site to rank for hundreds of unrelated expressions (this blog ranks for all sorts of keywords that I have plucked out of search engine referrals and written about).

The more you diversify your branding efforts, the more effort you should put into the diversification process. If you don’t have the time and resources to build and support distinctive brand profiles then satellite sites SEO is not for you. It should be a solution, not a problem. SEO for satellite sites has to put the user’s convenience ahead of the Web site operator’s desire to rank well in search engines because ultimately this all about pleasing the users.

You want your network to look professional and efficient in the search results. You don’t want it to look cheap and spammy. Keep that in mind and you should do okay.

4 Comments on Sattelite Sites SEO

By Nick on July 19, 2007 at 2:24 am

Hi Michael.

Excellent post. I have a question on this exact topic of cross-linking. Assuming you have two sites on the same topic - for example fishing. One targets fishing in germany, another targets fishing in spain. If you german site was your primary one, you’d obviously initially use that to help out the spanish one. But when the Spanish one gains a bit of traction, would you then go back to the Spanish site and if it had a page on “fishing rods” and link to a similar themed “fishing rods” page on the German site?

Or would you just pick 2-3 pages out and sitewide link them on both sites.

By Michael Martinez on July 19, 2007 at 4:12 am

It really depends on what your long-term goals are. Will you stop with Spain and Germany or do you want all of Europe? You have to look at the big picture and if the picture becomes too complicated to envision in advance you have make some compromises.

There is no harm in pointing links back at another site regardless of who owns it. What gets people into trouble is excessive reciprocal linking. If you’re talking about 1 site, 1 link that’s not excessive. If you’re swapping links with every site that offers an exchange, that’s going to look fishy to the search engines.

Sitewide linkage doesn’t really hurt either. In some cases it seems to help. I’ve seen sitewide links either be ignored or get new sites penalized. I think that there is a certain amount of trust involved.

By major_grooves on March 5, 2008 at 2:29 pm

On a similar note:

I have a website selling widgets in the UK, but our domain name is companyname.co.uk

I suspect that when people search for the products we sell (for which there are plenty of competitors), they search for it by locale, e.g. “*city* widgets “. To capture this, I was thinking about setting up a bunch of mini-sites, each with genuine unique content but optimised towards “*city* widgets ” and linking back to the main site and each other, instantly creating 20 inter-referring sites. I’m hoping that either the mini-site or the main company site will be on the 1st page when “*city* widgets ” are then searched for.

To achieve this I was going to register both “widgetscity.co.uk” and “widgets-city.co.uk” mainly to prevent anyone else copying my tactic.

Do you have any comments on this strategy? The one problem I can see is Google’s tendency to prefer websites that have been long established - suddenly having 20 websites spring up linking to you would be contrary to this so might not have as big an impact as they could.

Cheers for any comments.

By Michael Martinez on March 5, 2008 at 4:14 pm

I’ve never been a fan of the Instant SEO’d Network solution. That’s taking the easy path. You use a template and boilerplate text to create your content, just changing the names of cities and maybe some addresses of hotels or whatever.

There are already a million sites that do this, most of which don’t bring in much money.

Protecting your brand by capturing similar domain names is a good idea (you would want to 301 redirect them all to one domain) but if you’re going to build the brand across geographic satellites you need to build some intrinsic, unique value into each satellite.

I would build out the network one city at a time, if it were me. The purpose of setting up a timetable for rolling out each section or site is to give you time to reveiw what you’ve done and to distinguish the next section from the rest.

Comment

Log in or Register to post a comment.

More

Read more posts by Michael Martinez

About the Author

Michael Martinez is the Director of Search Strategies for Visible Technologies, Inc. A former moderator at SEO forums such as JimWorld an Spider-food, Michael has been active in search engine optimization since 1998 and Web site design and promotion since 1996. Michael was a regular contributor to Suite101 (1998-2003) and SEOmoz (2006).

Web Page Naming for Beginners High Quality Links: Help with internal link structure in SEO